A high-profile trial against Meta and Google has reignited a critical debate within the global media industry: are engagement-driven algorithms engineering addiction, particularly among children?
The case alleges that major tech platforms deliberately designed features to maximise user engagement in ways that may harm young users. The plaintiffs argument rests on the claim that recommendation systems, autoplay functions and personalised content feeds are intentionally structured to keep users online for longer.
Prosecutors have described these mechanics as analogous to slot machines or cigarette marketing tactics, claiming that these design choices target young users' developing brains and can contribute to long-term harm.
The tech giants reject claims that their platforms are inherently harmful, countering that addiction isn't a scientifically established diagnosis and that social media use can't be isolated from broader personal and environmental factors.
They hold firm that they highlight existing safety tools and parental controls, and argue that responsibility for screen time management cannot rest solely with technology providers.
The outcome of the case could set a significant precedent for how platforms design and regulate algorithmic systems moving forward.
However, the case goes beyond the courtroom. Media professionals have long used engagement metrics to shape editorial strategy, distribution models and revenue streams. This is because algorithms reward content that sparks strong reactions, frequent interaction and prolonged watch time.
If courts determine that certain engagement mechanisms are manipulative by design, it may prompt stricter regulations around algorithm transparency, youth protections and content recommendation practices. This would inevitably influence how content is created, optimised and distributed.
It also raises an important strategic question: is maximising clicks and watch time still a sustainable long-term objective? As the glare of attention grows, credibility and responsible amplification may become stronger differentiators than just simple virality.
Understanding how content is picked up, framed and distributed across platforms (and how audiences meaningfully respond) will be crucial. Sophisticated media monitoring and social analysis tools can provide clearer insight into sentiment, reach and impact beyond surface-level engagement numbers.
For those shaping today's media landscape, ethical foresight may prove just as important as algorithmic literacy.
Did you find this article insightful? Let us know in the comments section below.
*Image courtesy of Canva
**Information sourced from IOL, Japan Times, ABC News, AP News and ABC Columbia